"...
I was clothed in a white garment, very similar to the alb of our Catholic priests, but longer and wider, and I wore upon my
head a crown of vervain leaves, intertwined with a golden chain. I held a new sword in one hand, and in the other the ritual.
I kindled two fires with the requisite prepared substances, and began reading the evocations of the ritual in a voice at first
low, but rising by degrees... the smoke spread, the flame' caused the objects upon which it fell to waver, then it went out,
the smoke still floating white and slow about the marble altar; I seemed to feel a quaking of the earth, my ears tingled,
my heart beat quickly. I heaped more twigs and perfumes on the chafing-dishes, and as the flame again burst up, I beheld distinctly,
before the altar, the figure of a man of more than normal size, which dissolved and vanished away. I recommenced the evocations
and placed myself within a circle which I had drawn previously between the tripod and the altar. Thereupon the mirror which
was behind the altar seemed to brighten in its depth, a wan form was outlined therein, which increased and seemed to approach
by degrees. Three times, and with closed eyes, I invoked Apollonius. When I again looked forth there was a man in front of
me, wrapped from head to foot in a species of shroud, which seemed more grey than white. He was lean, melancholy and beardless,
and did not altogether correspond to my preconceived notion of Apollonius. I experienced an abnormally cold sensation, and
when I endeavored to question the phantom I could not articulate a syllable. I therefore placed my hand upon the sign of the
pentagram, and pointed the sword at the figure, commanding it mentally to obey and not alarm me, in virtue of the said sign.
The form thereupon became vague, and suddenly disappeared. I directed it to return, and presently felt, as it were, a breath
close by me; something touched my hand which was holding the sword, and the arm became immediately benumbed as far as the
elbow. I divined that the sword displeased the spirit, and I therefore placed its point downwards, close by me, within the
circle. The human figure reappeared immediately, but I experienced such an intense weakness in all my limbs, and a swooning
sensation came so quickly over me, that I made two steps to sit down, whereupon I fell into a profound lethargy, accompanied
by dreams, of which I had only a confused recollection when I came again to myself. For several subsequent days my arm remained
benumbed and painful. The apparition did not speak to me, but it seemed that the questions I had designed to ask answered
themselves in my mind…”
So runs the famous account given by the great
French occultist Eliphas Levi, of a magical ceremony undertaken on July 24th 1854 to summon the spirit of the first century
philosopher and miracle worker, Apollonius of Tyana. Levi, by his own account, spent twenty-one days fasting, praying and
deep in study of his subject before attempting the rite which he later described as "..an actual drunkenness of the imagination,
which must act powerfully upon a person otherwise nervous and impressionable.. the voluntary dream of a waking man". Though
Eliphas Levis account lacks the drama of Lucifuges appearance in 'The Damnation of Theron Ware', it has a quiet and resigned
air that is nevertheless believable, especially in regards to Levis statement that after the event he was ".. no longer the
same man; something of another world had passed into me; I was no longer either sad or cheerful, but I felt a singular attraction
towards death.." Levi had himself warned others against such rites in his writings, and now found himself sharing too much
in the kingdom of the dead.
According to E. M .Butler, the 'ritual' mentioned
by Levi, and recited sonorously in the Greek tongue, was the 'Magic Philosophy' of Patricius which he said contained the "doctrine
of Zoroaster and the writings of Hermes Trismegistus". The work mentioned is the "Magia Philosophica, hoc est Francisci Patricii
summi philosophi Zoroaster et eius CCCXX Oracula Chaldaica' first published by Francesco Patrizzi in Venice, 1591. Actually
an extended collection of the late classical 'Chaldaean Oracles' by the magician "Julian the Theurgist', the 'Magia Philosophica'
of Patrizzi largely takes over from the earlier and briefer collection of, and commentaries on the same, by the Byzantine
scholar Gernistos Pletho whose work on the Oracles seems to have been first composed during his attendace at the Councils
of Ferrara and Florence, held in 1438-9 to secure the union of the Roman and orthodox Churches. It would no doubt seem curious
to a modern scholar to see the 'Chaldaean Oracles' placed beside the figure of the Pythagorean sage Apollonius of Tyana, but
to earlier authorities Apollonius was himself both magician and alchemist, indeed this aspect of his biography has probably
yet to be fully written. But first we must go back to Plethon, and through him to the ultimate sources for Levis' imaginary
Apollonius.
Gemistos Plethon was born in Constantinople
sometime between 1355 and 1360, his father seems to have been chief secretary at the great church of Hagia Sophia, now an
immense mosque in Sultanahmet, the old quarter of Istanbul. Some members of his family entered monastic service, one at Mount
Athos, another perhaps at Chora. Gemistos himself had a singular distaste for monastic life, and in his later years in Italy
and on the island of Mistra displayed a singular lack of interest in Christianity generally, quite in keeping with his adopted
character as 'last of the Hellenes' and a living representative of the ancient Sun-cult. At Constantinople he would probably
have entered a course of basic education at Hagia Sophia, perhaps under the general tutelage of the great Nikephoras Gregoras,
or the eminent Demetrios Kydones. Gemistos Plethon is known to have excelled in the higher education provided, compiling text
books for other students ranging from grammar to musical theory, and correcting numerous ancient manuscripts of the astronomical
and geographical works of Claudius Ptolemy and of Strabo. Gemistos taught mathematical and literary subjects to many distinguished
pupils, one of whom was later to become the immensely powerful Cardinal Bessarion.
Whilst still at Constantinople Gemistos sought
out a private tutor, the Hellenized Jewish scholar Elissaeus. Plethos' adversary, the Patriarch Gennadios, lists amongst Elissaeus'
influences the writings of the Arab philosopher Averroes (Abu Walid ibn Rushid), the Neoplatonists Iamblichus and Proclus,
and the Persian mage Zoroaster. Exactly who Elissaeus was is hard to define, we know that Jews held administrative and teaching
posts throughout the Byzantine empire, indeed the traveller Benjamin of Tudela wrote that already by 1168 two and a half thousand
Jewish merchants and silk-workers lived in a ghetto across the Golden Horn. Gemistos Plethon could certainly not read Arabic,
there is much evidence to suggest that he read nor spoke any significant amount of Latin, and that Hebrew was also unknown
to him, as by his time much of the preserved writings and commentaries on ancient philosophy were preserved in these languages
and not in the original Greek, we can suppose that Plethon resorted to a Jewish teacher who could provide him with texts.
Elissaeus must have been an unusually gifted
and learned man, not only is he credited with producing Greek translations of the Old Testament books (preserved now in the
library of St. Marks in Venice ) which he gave to Pletho or to his pupil Bessarion, he also introduced Plethon to the magical
and occult writings of his own heritage. According to the Patriarch Gennadios "..this man (Elissaeus) also expounded to Gemistos
the doctrines of Zoroaster and others. He was ostensibly a Jew, but in fact a pagan. Gemistos stayed with hjm for a long time,
not only as his pupil but in his service, living at his expense, for he was one of the most influential men at the court.."
Now we already know that the 'doctrines of Zoroaster' meant the Chaldaean Oracles to Gemistos Plethon, and that he is widely
regarded as having himself invented this connection between the two; is it not equally possible, bearing in mind the statement
of Gennadios, that the Jew Elissaeus impressed upon Plethos mind the Magian, or Zoroastrian origin of these verses, and that
such an orientalizing view of them would be in keeping with a Jewish scholar? Certainly, Plethons selection of verses from
the Chaldaean Oracles is briefer than that of the eleventh century occultist Michael Psellus, whose handwritten manuscripts
remained in Plethons possession for most of his life, supplied either by Elissaeus, by his old tutor Nikephoras Gregoras who
also showed an interest in the Oracles, or bought by Gemistos from one of the numerous dealers in manuscripts working in Constantinople.
As Gemistos Plethos edition of the Chaldaean
Oracles differs in so many respects from all others before or since, and as the orientalizing character of the selections
and translations stands out in comparison with modem editions I give a complete translation:
Inquire after the channel of the soul: wherefrom,
in what order,
Having served the body, to that order from
which you flowed
You shall rise again, combining the act
with the sacred word.
Incline not downwards: below the earth lies
a precipice
That drags down beneath the sevenfold steps,
below which
Is the throne of dread Necessity.
Your vessel shall be occupied by the beasts
of the earth.
Do not enlarge your Fate.
For nothing imperfect rolls from the sovereignty
of the Father.
But the Paternal intellect does not admit
her volition
Until she has issued forth out of oblivion
and spoken the word,
Having taken in the memory of the holy watch-word
of the Father;
You must hasten towards the light and rays
of the Father,
Whence your soul was sent out clothed in
abundant intellect.
The earth mourns them continually unto their
children:
Those who thrust out the soul and inhale
are easy to loose.
In the left flanks of the couch is the source
of virtue
Which remains wholly within and does not
give away its virginity.
The soul of mortals will somehow constrain
the god into herself,
Having nothing mortal in her she is utterly
intoxicated from God.
For she glories in harmony, beneath which
is the mortal body.
Since the soul is a fire, luminous through
the power of the Father,
She remains immortal and is mistress of
life
And shall be filled with many repletions
from the depths of the world.
Seek you Paradise.
Do not pollute the spirit, do not depress
the surface.
Even the image has its portion in the circumsplendent
place.
Do not leave behind the dung of matter for
the precipice.
Do not draw it forth that it may not suffer
in going out.
By extending the fiery intellect
To the act of piety, you shall also save
the liquidescent body.
Then from the depths of the earth leap forth
the dogs of the underworld,
Showing no true sign to mortal man.
Nature gives proof that there exist pure
daemons
And that the fruits even of evil matter
are worthy and good.
The penalties are constrainers of men,
Let the immortal depth of the soul be leader.
Spread wide all eyes upwards.
O man, the contrivance of most daring Nature!
If you say this to me often, you will see
the word forever;
For then the curved mass of heaven is not
visible.
The stars do not shine, the light of the
moon is veiled,
The earth stands not firm. All things appear
as lightening.
Do not call upon the self-revealed image
of Nature.
Draw tight from all sides the reins of the
fire with an untouched soul.
When you behold the most holy fire without
form
Flashing with quivering flames through the
recesses of the whole world,
Then hearken to the voice of the fire.
The paternal intellect has sown symbols
in men's souls.
Learn what is intelligible, for it exists
outside the intellect.
There is indeed something intelligible,
Which you must understand by the flower
of the intellect.
All things descend from one fire.
For the Father perfected everything and
committed it
To the second intellect, which the races
of men call the first.
Spells are thought by the Father and think
themselves.
They are moved by voiceless wills to have
understanding.
Lo! how the world has inflexible intellectual
upholders!
The Father has snatched himself away;
But not shutting off his own fire in his
intellectual power,
The Father does not impel fear but diffuses
persuasion.
The 'Zoroastrian' origins of the Chaldean corpus
was much debated throughout the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, Patrizzi's criticisms notwithstanding, the name of the
ancient Persian sage remained firmly linked to the Chaldean Oracles until the seventeenth century where, with Martin del Rio's
'Disquisitionum Magiacarum', Zoroaster and Orpheus are the fathers of a natural science bordering on black magic, though as
the magician Agrippa was to point out, no religion is so full of error that it does not contain any wisdom at all ("..nulla
enim religio tam erronea, quae non aliquid sapientiae contineat.." De Occulta Philosophia, 1533).
If the Jew Elissaeus was indeed Gemistos Plethons
teacher in the matter of the Chaldaean Oracles, it might be remarked why no mention of traditional Jewish mysticism finds
its way into any of Plethons writings. True, much of what we now term Cabbala spread mainly from the west to the east, yet
Jewish emigres in the Byzantine Empire were in communication with all parts of the Jewish diaspora, indeed Constantinople
proved one of the most fertile grounds for the spread of the Sabbatean heresy two hundred years later. Gemistos seems therefore
to have been either unaware of the Cabbala, or perhaps merely uninterested in the same fashion as he was uninterested in Islam
and the Christian faith. Gemistos was intent on re-discovering and re-animating the pagan teachings of the ancient Hellenic
sages and of theMagi, which he saw preserved in the riddles of his 'Zoroastrian' verses.
Although the charge of practising occult arts
was never formally levelled against Gemistos Plethon, he certainly practised astrology and cannot have been unaware of the
magical nature of his own studies. Gemistos had many enemies in the church, not least the Patriarch Gennadios, and it is perhaps
the fate of his personal tutor Elissaeus (burnt to death in his own dwelling, a judicial execution for religious dissent)
which forced Gemistos to maintain such reserve about his own beliefs and practises. As a Christian, nominally at least, it
would have been a capitol offence for Gemistos to openly advocate his views regarding the ancient cults, to 'Hellenize' as
the legal code of the fourteenth century 'Hexabiblos' of Harmenopoulos has it. Gemistos' advocacy of sun-worship, his veneration
for the high priests of pagan learning and his personal zeal for the clearly daemonic 'Chaldaean Oracles' would have brought
him ultimately to the stake. Plethon somehow managed to avoid serious catastrophe both in life and after death; buried on
the Greek island of Mistra just before its invasion by the Turks, his body was exhumed and carried away to Rimini by one of
his most ardent admirers, the Italian warlord and unashamed lover of pagan learning Sigismond Malatesta. Plethons remains
were finally entombed in the walls of the Tempio Malstestiano, a reconstructed church designed by Leon Battista Alberti as
a quasi-pagan temple, and dedicated to Sigismond's mistress Isotta. The 'Prince' of Rimini kept himself in power by a mixture
of genuine erudition, youthful arrogance and military brilliance, yet his reputation for adultery, heresy, and murder caused
Pope Pius II to have his effigy twice burnt at Rome.
Magical writings existed in abundance in the
Constantinople of Plethos' day, from Byzantine texts of the 'Testament of Solomon' and the 'Exorcism of Athanasios' with their
lists of demonic spirits, to the more highbrow writings of Michael Psellus and the fifth century philosopher-magician Proclus
Diadochus, penultimate head of the Platonic academy at Athens. The twelfth century sorcerer Gabrielopoulos is said to have
kept his magic 'Book of Solomon' inside tortoise shells polished "like pearls", whilst the Solomonic textbook found in the
possession of one Isaac Aaron in 1172 was designed to summon legions of demons at once, which fact no doubt led to his demise.
The connection between these Byzantine treatises and the later 'Solomonic' textbooks of Northern Europe has been little studied,
but certainly the passage from ancient to modem magic lies partly in this field. The famous 'Triangle of Art' in which the
spirits are said to appear in the English 'Lesser Key of Solomon' is inscribed with three 'Hebrew' words which on examination
are plainly Greek: the "ANAPHAXATON:PRIMEUMATON:TETRAGRAMMATON" written around the exterior of Solomons' Triangle is the usual
wizards request for the spirit to "appear in a fair form" with the commanding name of the Most High God appended lest the
demon should in any way miscontrue the meaning."[ Anphaneintai] preumenous ap'ommaton.." as a Byzantine clerk might have cobbled
together from the "..idoito ..preumenous ap'ommatos.." of Aeschylus. "..May the god appear in a fair shape by this sign.."
as one ancie;nt magicains' abbreviated scrawl in the margin of a greco-Egyptian papyrus reads, and there is every reason to
believe that the terrible deity summoned ("..the Headless One.. awesome and invisible spirit..") frightened him to death for
that particular piece of stupidity. The printed English text of Solomons 'Key' mentioned even includes variants for' Anaphaxeton'
('anapazaton' and 'anaphanaton') which utterly preclude the possibility of its being a Hebrew inscription, 'Primeumaton' is
merely a contraction such as would be found in early manuscripts, or such as any Byzantine magician would have quite naturally
made themselves.
Plethon would not have been greatly interested
in such corrupt textbooks of the wizards art, though he may have been struck by their association with other more laudatory
productions. One of the most popular late Byzantine/early medieval magical works is the so-called 'Magic Treatise of Solomon'
(titled' Apotelesmatica Pragmateia' in some manuscripts), which often appears with a fragmentary work called the 'Book of
the Wisdom of Apollonius of Tyana'. This, and the early fragments of such collections as the 'Hymns of Orpheus' and the 'Golden
Verses of Pythagoras' were of intense interest to Gemistos Plethon who spent years collecting, collating and excerpting from
these texts. For Gemistos the practise of magical evocation, the summoning of a departed spirit, would have involved a much
weightier operation and a purer intention than anything demanded by the 'Solomonic' literature. The great fifth century philosopher-magician
Proclus regarded all such rites as a communion of similar spirits, that of the magician with that of the departed. Indeed,
as an advocate of the theurgic cult, Proclus, and his erstwhile disciple Gemistos Plethon, saw the evocation as an assistance
to the magician from one whose sight was clear to one enmeshed in matter. During the rite, the magicians soul stood in the
same peril as it would at death, the being summoned therefore acting the part of a guiding spirit ( daemon paredros ).
Apollonius himself summoned the spirit of the
Homeric hero Achilles, which he recounted to his disciple Damis whilst they were crossing the sea of Euboea. True to his pythagorean
teachings, Apollonius offered no gifts, no blood sacrifices, no threats to the spirit, but merely approached the mound where
Achilles was said to have been interred and offered a simple and sincere prayer:
" O Achilles, most of mankind declare that
you are dead, but I cannot agree with them, nor can Pythagoras my spiritual ancestor. If then we hold to the truth, show to
us your form; for you would profit not a little by showing yourself to my eyes, if you should be able to use them to attest
to your existence."
Achilles, in Homers Iliad (book xxiii), experiences
a visitation from the forlorn ghost of Patroclos (entreating Achilles for a proper funeral) which retreated from his grasp
and slipped into the earth "with a faint cry". The passage in the Iliad (xxiii, 192f.) where Achilles summons the winds to
assist the burning pyre were interpreted by Theurgists and Neoplatonists alike as a type of purification of the deceased's
soul and a restitution of it to its own element ( Proclus' 'Commentary on the Republic of Plato' 1,152;7, where the interpretation
is ascribed to the divine teacher Syrianus). How different is all this to the pit of blood with which Odysseus fed the spectres
of the dead, hoping for a sight of the blind prophet Tiresias (Odyssey xi):
"..gaping with wounds the forms of heroes
strode full majestic, in thundering train:
these and a myriad more swarmed round
and all their dark assembly shrieked;
dumbfounded by the sight, I stood agape,
fear ran sharp-shivering through my blood;
anxious, I command the sacrifice to haste:
fast the flayed victims to the flames are
cast,
and mumbled vows and mystic songs applied
To darkest god and gloomy concubine;
desperate I wave my blade at the blood
they started back, their dark throng
trembling stood; whilst round the grim
ditch black blood untasted flowed 'til
most awful of these shades, Tiresias rose!"
At the conclusion of Philostratus' work 'The
Life of Apollonius of Tyana' is a remarkable account of how one of his pupils, doubting the immortality of the soul, is visited
by the master in a type of vivid waking dream (unseen by his associates) and receives the following oracle:
"The soul is immortal, and 'tis no possession
of
thine own, but of Providence,
And after the body is wasted away, like
a swift
horse freed from its traces,
It lightly leaps forward and mingles itself
with
the light air,
Loathing the spell of harsh and painful
servitude
which it has endured.
But for thee, what use is there in this'!
Some day
when thou art no more thou shalt believe.
So why, as long as thou art amongst the
living,
dost thou explore these mysteries?"
This oracle of the now deified Apollonius calls
to mind the thirteenth and twenty-second sections of Pletho's 'Chaldaean Oracles', indeed it may itself be regarded as both
a genuine communication, and a guide for those hardy souls assaying the theurgic art of ascent to their spiritual original.
The Neoplatonist Proclus believed that the gods had shown him the essential psychic signs (the Theurgic 'Character') of several
Greek heroes, including that of Plato himself, as well as their "mystic names", a fact which enabled him to bring about their
appearance at his evocations. From theurgic writings, those of Proclus especially, we can deduce that in these claims to having
evoked such and such a person or deity the subjects experienced a type of self-recollection, a ritual 'anamnesis', whereby
the lineage of their own soul was visibly displayed, often very publicly, for the edification and enlightenment of all mankind,
"Inquire after the channel of the soul... combining the act with the sacred word" as the Chaldaean Oracles command. At the
lowest these evocations constitute the supreme spiritual arrogance, a great thinker like Proclus could be excused his 'evoking'
both Plato and the pythagorean Numenius of Apamea, whilst an even more profound philosopher like Plotinus could quite reasonably
be supposed to have filled a Roman temple of Isis with the light diffused by his guardian spirit. Yet sure as Julian the Theurgist
claimed also to have summoned and questioned Plato, so every unlearned impostor in the ancient world may have claimed spiritual
descent for his or her soul from one of the Olympians.
Behind this art of evocation, this 'drawing
into being' from the world of invisible potentials, lay a whole science of physical and psychical sympathies and antipathies.
The short tract 'On the Priestly Art' by Proclus givesa deceptively simple series of solar correspondences throughout the
animal, vegetable and mineral kingdoms, whose theory relies for its justification upon his immense logical and theological
treatises, his commentaries upon Plato, the 'Geometry' of Euclid, and the mysticism of the Chaldaean Oracles to which he was
addicted. The magicians like Proclus and his predecessor Iamblichus of Chalcis, as well as early Christian writers regarded
the composition of angelic, daemonic, and human bodies as participating in the energies of one another and of the Gods in
differing degrees. To explain the confusion created by particular types of spiritual experience, these writers had recourse
to the idea of a 'vehicle' of the soul, a type of starry envelope free from subjection to normal physical space and time.
Apollonius of Tyana, like Pythagoras before him, was credited with the ability to appear in two places at once, sometimes
seperated by immense distances. This ability, conferred upon him by his having been initiated into the life of this world
and the next finds its traditional expression in the story of how Apollonius visited the cave of Trophonius, mythical builder
of Apollo's temple at Delphi and presiding daemon of an oracular cave at Lebadea. According to the story in Philostratus,
Apollonius of Tyana descended into the cave not to receive a personal oracle, but "..in the interests of philosophy.." to
which the officiating priests strongly objected. After seven days Apollonius emerged from the cave carrying a book of pythagorean
philosophy, perhaps written in the same 'Cappadocian' dialect of greek in which Apollonius is supposed to have written his
works on sacrifices, and on divination by the stars.
This descent into the underworld was viewed
by theurgists as a natural progression from normal education, a threefold process of purgation, illumination and perfection.
Hierocles, that indefatigable commentator on the 'Golden Verses of Pythagoras' perfectly sums up the aim of this curriculum:
"..Now to all these things that
have been said in particular concerning the soul, in regard to its purification, and to its deliverance,
we ought to join things of the like nature with these, and that analogically and proportionately answer to them, for the purgation
of the luminous body. And hence it necessarily follows, that the purgations which are made by means of the mathematical sciences,
should be accompanied by the mystical purgations of the initiations; and that the deliverance, performed by dialectics, should
be attended by the introduction to what is most sublime and most excellent. For these are properly the things that purify,
and that render perfect the spiritual chariot of the soul, that disengage it from the pollutions and from the disorder of
matter, and that render it fit to converse with pure spirits.."
Most ancient authorities regard the pythagorean
'Golden Verses' as the work of Lysis of Tarentum; in his 'Life of Pythagoras', Diogenes Laertius seems to refer to them as
".. the 'Sacred Poem' which begins: 'young men, come reverence in quietude all these my words..", a line echoed in later texts
of the 'Golden Verses'. Another early poetical fragment from the 'Scopiads' reads: "..be not shameless before any man..".
Clearly, very early pythagoreans circulated genuine sayings of the master with their own oracular utterances, and these passed
through numerous versions before being committed to writing. An ancient tradition has it that Apollonius of Tyana produced
a work on theurgic magic called 'The Golden Flowers', and it is possible that this is the same as the 'Golden Leaves' of the
sage Balinus ( as Arabic texts translate the name Apollonius) accredited with the authorship of an alchemical work called
'The Secret of Creation' which contains an early version of the 'Emerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistos'. Arabic legends recounting
the discovery of the 'Emerald Tablet' influenced much western thinking on the subject, and it is quite possible that in illustrations
of the fable (particularly one in the 16th century 'Aurora Consurgens') depicting an aged man holding a tablet, upon which
the secret of alchemy is represented as a group hieroglyphs, Apollonius of Tyana may be intended. Confusion between Balinus
and Abalinus led to some Arab writers identifying Apollonius of Tyana with 'Apollonius the Carpenter' (actually Apollonius
Pergaeus) who wrote a mathematicall treatise on conic sections and constructed mechanical marvels like the speaking automata
of the ancients. Alchemical works entered Islamic circles early on, if they were not already there, presumably from centres
such as Alexandria and Panopolis. Spiritually inclined alchemical writings are much in evidence from this period, the third
century 'Chresopoeia' of the alchemist Cleopatra has a circular diagram inscribed in Greek characters with the following legend:
"One is All, of Him is everything, for Him is everything, in Him is everything. The Snake is the One, it has two symbols:
Good and Evil". Emanating from the diagram is a long arm, apparently a type of distillation apparatus, suspended from this
is a group of symbols which appear to represent an alchemist at work at his 'kerotakis', a basic furnace, whilst alighting
upon his head appears a small stick figure of a guardian spirit, rather as the Egyptian god Harpocrates was meant to dwell
at the 'summit of the psyche' in the moment of divine union during theurgic rites. A comparison of these ideas with the so-called
'Emerald Tablet' is instructive:
"True without error, certain and most true:
that which is above is like that which is below, and that which is below is like that which is above, for performing the miracles
of the one true thing. And as all things were from one, by the mediation of one, so all things arose from this one by adaptation;
the father of it is the sun, its mother the moon, the wind carries it in its belly, its nurse is earth. This is the father
of all perfection, the consummation of all the world. Its power is complete if it be converted to its element. separate the
earth from the fire, subtle from gross, gently and with much industry. It ascends from earth to heaven, and descends again
to earth, receiving the strength of superiors and inferiors, having the glory of the whole imparted to it. Let all obscurity
fly from you, this is the fortitude of all fortitudes, overcoming every subtle and penetrating every solid thing: so was the
world created, from hence were all adaptations of which this is the manner. Therefore I am called thrice-great, having the
three parts of the philosophy of the whole world. that which I have written is completed concerning the operation of the sun."
Just how credible could it be to assert the
identity of these 'Apollonian' writings with the preserved 'Golden Verses' attributed to Lysis? Perhaps the sage of Tyana
wrote them from memory in the cave of Trophonius, and subsequent readers altered his words trying to wrest some sense from
his mixture of obscurity and dialectical Greek.
The very title 'Golden Verses','Golden Leaves'
etc. connects these utterances not just with magic, but with the cult of the dead in ancient Orphism with which so much pythagorean
religion was suffused. Thin leaves of gold discovered at Thurii and dating from around the time of Plato bear inscriptions
identifying them with Orphic-pythagorean cult. In them the soul of the departed begs Persephone and the company of infernal
gods for entry, claiming "..1 too am of you blessed race.." and that "..1 have paid the penalty for deeds unrighteous..".
The 'penalty' is the previous incarnated life, incurred by the soul in the otherworld. Another gold leaf proclaims; ".. I
have flown out from the circle of heavy grief, and stepped swift-footed upon the circle of joy..". The earliest surviving
references to the divine Orpheus in Attic literature contain allusions to spells and incantations "..written down in the Thracian
inscriptions of golden voiced Orpheus.." (Euripides, , Alcestis' I. 967). The oracle delivered by Apollonius of Tyana to his
doubting pupil regarding the souls escape from the bonds of matter, "..the spell of harsh and painful servitude..", has a
distict echo in the verses of the 'Chaldaean Oracles', the pythagorean 'Golden Verses' as well as in these Orphic gold lamellae:
"..Blessed and fortunate one! thou shalt be god instead of mortal..".Similar gold plates have been found in tombs from the
second to the fourth centuries B.C. at sites ranging from Lipari in Crete, to Sybaris in southern Italy.
These gold plates are not, however the earliest
surviving fragments of Orphic-pythagorean cult; a sixth century B.C. Greek colony established at Olbia, situated at the mouth
of the river Bug on the Black sea, yielded up to the Soviet archaeologists a small group of rectangular bone plates about
two and a half inches long, bearing crude inscriptions and designs variously interpreted as musical instruments or offering
tables. A group of three such bone tablets discovered in 1951 bear inscriptions pointing to their Dionysiac-Orphic character:
i)..LIFE..DEATH..LIFE..
..TRUTH..A[ athanatos]..
..DIO[NYSOS]..ORPHIK[OS]..'
ii)"..PEACE.. WAR.. TRUTH..
..LIES..D ION[YSOS]..
..A[ athanatos?].."
iii)"..DIO[NYSOS].. TRUTH..
[illegible ]..IA.. SOUL.. ..
A[ athanatos?].. "
The rudely scratched letters on these flat
bone tokens to the Underworld speak volumes to one aquainted with Dionysiac- Orphic cult: born into life, passing through
initiatory death, re-entering life as a devotee of the great god Dionysus, and finally the cryptic final letter ' A ' perhaps
for the Greek 'athanatos': 'undying', 'immortal'.
The transformations of life into life, through
mystic death and rebirth to everlasting divinity were enjoyed by many long before the days of Apollonius of Tyana. As the
Orphics held their souls to be born again in Dionysus, as the theurgists and Neoplatonists claimed divine participation in
the natures of particular powers, so Apollonius is credited with heavenly ancestry. Just prior to his birth, the god Proteus
appeared to Apollonius' mother in the guise of an "Egyptian daemon", when his mother enquired what sort of child she would
bear Proteus simply said "Myself'. No fitter parentage could have been found for the sage who valued foreknowledge above all
abilities than the god
"..who knows what is now, what was before,
and what will be in the future.."
(Orpheus' Hymn to Proteus)
Bibliography
Atwood, M.A. , A Suggestive Inquiry into Hermetic Mystery', London 1918. Betz, H.D. 'The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation',
Chicago 1992.
Butler, E.M. 'Ritual Magic', Cambrige 1949. Copenhaver, B. 'Hermetica', Cambridge 1996.
Crowley, A. 'The Book of the Goetia of Solomon the King', 1904. Dacier, M. 'Life of pythagoras &c. " London 1707.
Diogenes Laertius, 'Lives of Eminent Philosophers', 2 vols. Harvard 1991. Greenfield, R. 'Traditions of Belief in Late
Byzantine Demonology', 1988.
Johnston, S.I. 'Hekate Soteira', Atlanta 1990. Kerenyi, C. 'Dionysos', Princeton 1996.
Khaldun,M. 'The Muqaddimah', 3 vols. London 1986. Kingsley, P . , Ancient Philosophy Mystery and Magic', Oxford 1996.
Lewy, H. 'Chaldaean Oracles and Theurgy', Cairo 1951. Loughran, E.P. 'Proclus on the Priestly Art According to the
Greeks', 1996.
Maguire, H 'Byzantine Magic', Harvard 1995. Mango, C. 'Byzantium', London 1994.
Philostratus, 'The Life of Apollonius of Tyana', 2 vols. Harvard 1989. Roob, A. 'The Hermetic Museum', Taschen 1997.
Taylor, F .S. , A Survey of Greek Alchemy', J.H.S 1930. Thomdike, L 'History of Magic and Experimental
Science', Columbia 1923.
Walker, D.P. 'Spiritual and Demonic Magic', London 1958. West, M.L. 'The Orphic Poems', Oxford 1983.
Woodhouse, C.M. 'Gemistos Plethon Last of the Hellenes', Oxford 1986.
This article may not be copied without written permission from the author.
|